At first, I thought the title of Bishop's book of poems was somewhat random, and even after reading a couple of poems I still didn't see the reason for the title. Yet, when studying the poems in class and also learning more about Bishop herself, I've come to realize that when it comes to her particular art, nothing she does is pointless.
Geography describes the Earth and its inhabitants. All of Bishop's poems in some way connect to geography. They all have relatable themes that connect the readers as well. For Bishop personally, these poems are about lessons she has learned through connections to geography, which is why she put "First Lessons in Geography" in the front of her book. As for the number three in the title, the only conclusion I can gather is that she has lived in three continents of the world, and this book is meant to show what she has learned in her life in all three places.
The poem "In the Waiting Room" is a great example of her use of geography as a theme. In this poem, Bishop learns through looking at the National Geographic, that though landscapes may separate people, everyone is the same. She also uses geographical imagery such as, "I was saying it to stop the sensation of falling off the round, turning world…" to describe her disorienting experience. In her poem "Poem," Bishop takes great care to describe in detail the nature and landscape that is a part of the painting she is admiring. In "Moose," she also describes the landscape, and uses the moose as a thing of simple beauty that connects strangers on a bus and brings them wonder. In "Crusoe in England," she describes how a solitary person on a deserted island is able to find comfort, or perhaps distraction, in the surrounding landscape.
I am not particularly partial to poetry. I prefer to be able to read something and be able to take it at face value, and then later interpret it how I wish. Poetry is not as straightforward and I have a hard time understanding its meaning. Not only this, but I enjoy long, engaging stories with beautiful descriptive language. Poetry doesn't seem to fit my specifications and it just doesn't pull at all the right strings for me. This is not to say that there aren't some poems that I greatly enjoy. If I read a poem without interpreting it, I want it to leave me "wowed." Then once interpreted, I want to be speechless, disoriented, and enlightened all at once.
Bishop's poems were hard for me to understand. After reading most of them, I was left greatly confused. Some poems made me feel as though I wasted my time in reading them, while others such as "One Art," I was able to understand and enjoy. Once we discussed Bishop and her poems in class, however, I found that I greatly appreciate her preciseness and dedication. Her poems were edited and edited until they were just right for her and until they had the exact effect that she wanted. Once I was able to understand the possible message of her poems and understand her possible reasoning for the way they were written, I discovered that I enjoy these poems, and I was indeed left feeling speechless, disoriented, and enlightened. She's not my favorite poet but her mastery in her craft is admirable. I only wish I didn't have to study her poems in order to appreciate them.
